Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Paper
Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal
Veterans are among the populations that need to be given critical care in every healthcare facility within the United States. This population develops various health issues when serving the nation, and therefore they should not be left out when caring for vulnerable populations. The majority of U.S. military veterans live a challenging life due to the injuries they experienced during their military service. Such injuries contribute to chronic pain among the veterans, where they are prescribed opioids as the most appropriate medication to relieve pain (Leonard et al., 2021).
However, due to their persistent pain, the veterans use the medication for a prolonged period leading to the addition of the drug. The addiction contributes to other physical, emotional, and psychological impacts that make it challenging for the military to cope with their life situations. Some commit suicide due to the lack of medical support and intervention from the healthcare system of the country they served when they developed health issues.
Since the veterans developed health issues while serving their nation, policies and guidelines need to be developed nationally to ensure that they access improved medical intervention to address their health issues. Therefore, various aspects regarding health policy proposal among veterans experiencing different health issues due to their increased use of opioids to manage their chronic pain have been discussed, including the proposed policy and guidelines, the need for the policy, and the use of the policy among the interprofessional team to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of high-quality health outcomes.
The Proposed Policy and Guidelines
The main aim of proposing a policy and guidelines among the veterans addicted to opioids due to their chronic pain is to provide improved efficient and effective holistic care. In this case, the best policy to achieve this goal involves providing free medical services to the veterans in any healthcare facility within the nation. The reason for free medical services is that most veterans may not afford to access care services due to their low financial condition. Most veterans visit different healthcare facilities seeking medical intervention to the extent that all money and property depletes due to the severity of their health issues. When they get in such a situation, most veterans may not afford care services anymore, leading to more suffering.
Besides, the reason for suggesting that the veterans should be provided with care services at any healthcare facility within the nation is because some of them may be experiencing severe physical, emotional, and psychological health issues to the extent that they may be unable to visit specified facilities, especially the veteran care centers. In such a situation, the veterans can visit any care facility, even within their localities.
Moreover, the guidelines necessary for improving the health condition among the veterans involve the use of a standardized method to assess the physical, emotional, and psychological conditions experienced by this population (Seal et al., 2017). In this case, a standardized method will ensure that the healthcare providers in any facility where the veterans visit serve them according to findings from the standardized assessment.
The Need for the Policy
According to research, more than half of U.S. veterans experience health issues associated with opioids use. The reason for using this substance is that it is considered the most appropriate medication to relieve severe pain. Most veterans who have served in a warzone or undergone extensive training experience severe chronic pain that continuously forces them to use the medication.
Opioids are prepared in a way that they will cause addiction when used for a prolonged period (Frank et al., 2019). This is the reason why most of the veterans who use opioids are addicted to the drug. Addiction to opioids contributes to other health issues such as mental disorders, emotional issues, and physical effects of drug withdrawal. These issues have significantly affected the veterans to the extent that they cannot access care services. Therefore, there is a need to develop a policy that encourages this population to access care services within their residence.
Currently, veterans are provided with low-quality services since they only visit veteran healthcare centers to access care services at an affordable cost. Veterans who are unable to visit their specified facilities are forced to seek medical interventions from other care centers where they may not be recognized. Therefore, they end up being given little or no attention, leading to their deteriorated health issues. However, through the policy proposed, the veterans can be provided with quality health services in any care facility across the country with little or no cost. It is necessary to work towards improving the health outcomes of this population because they suffered while enhancing the security of the nation. Through the policy, any healthcare provider can serve the veterans to enhance holistic care regardless of whether or not the professional is meant to serve the military forces alone.
Enhancing High-Quality Outcomes using the Interprofessional Approach
Due to the emotional, physical, and psychological health issues that veterans experienced due to chronic pain and addiction to opioids, the interprofessional team members necessary for holistic care include the nurses, physicians, physical therapists, psychologists, and pharmacists. In this case, the nurses’ role is to educate the veterans on medical adherence and provide them with necessary care in various healthcare facilities. Besides, the role of the physicians is to treat any health issues evident due to chronic pain and opioids abuse (Buys et al., 2020).
Moreover, the role of the physical therapists is to engage the veterans in various physical activities to strengthen their muscles, bones and refresh their minds, thus relieving the pain experienced in such areas. Furthermore, the role of the psychologists is to offer various cognitive therapies and counseling to health the mental disorders that the veterans may be experiencing. Lastly, the role of the pharmacists is to prescribe alternative medications for the veterans to reduce their use of opioids, thus addressing their addictive issue.
The efficiency of these services can be enhanced through the proposed policy since the required interprofessional team members can be found in any healthcare facility across the nation. Therefore, the veterans can be provided with care services whenever they need them at any healthcare facility. Besides, the effectiveness of care services provided to the veterans will e enhanced since all the professionals mentioned play their roles based on their expertise. This implies that every healthcare professional will address only the issue that he or she has sufficient expertise, knowledge, and experience and leave other issues to be addressed by various care professionals. By so doing, the veterans will be provided with high-quality services that promote their health outcomes.
In conclusion, the veterans’ role in the nation during their military period is sufficient for policies and guidelines to be developed to promote their health conditions. In this case, the policy necessary to improve the health condition of the veterans involves the provision of free medical services at any healthcare facility within the nation. Besides, the guidelines necessary involve the use of a standardized health condition assessment method. In this case, the interprofessional team is critical for health promotion among the population.
Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Paper References
Buys, M. J., Bayless, K., Romesser, J., Anderson, Z., Patel, S., Zhang, C., … & Brooke, B. S. (2020). Opioid use among veterans undergoing major joint surgery managed by a multidisciplinary transitional pain service. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 45(11), 847-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101797
Frank, J. W., Carey, E., Nolan, C., Kerns, R. D., Sandbrink, F., Gallagher, R., & Ho, P. M. (2019). Increased non-opioid chronic pain treatment in the veterans’ health administration, 2010–2016. Pain Medicine, 20(5), 869-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny149
Leonard, C., Ayele, R., Ladebue, A., McCreight, M., Nolan, C., Sandbrink, F., & Frank, J. W. (2021). Barriers to and Facilitators of Multimodal Chronic Pain Care for Veterans: A National Qualitative Study. Pain Medicine, 22(5), 1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa312
Seal, K., Becker, W., Tighe, J., Li, Y., & Rife, T. (2017). Managing chronic pain in primary care: it does take a village. Journal of general internal medicine, 32(8), 931-934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4047-5
MSNFP6026 Capella Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Instructions
Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Paper Question Description
Develop a 2–4-page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.
Assessment Instructions for Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Paper
The analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.
For this assessment you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for the health care issue and target population you addressed in Assessment 1. If for some reason you wish to change your specific issue and/or target population, contact your FlexPath faculty.
The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.
Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.
Length of proposal: 2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Template linked in the Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your analysis.
The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6026 – Biopsychosocial Concepts for Advanced Nursing Practice II Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.
Access to Care
Brooks, E., Dailey, N. K., Bair, B. D., & Shore, J. H. (2016). Listening to the patient: Women veterans’ insights about health care needs, access, and quality in rural areas. Military Medicine, 181(9), 976–981.
Caldwell, J. T., Ford, C. L., Wallace, S. P., Wang, M. C., & Takahashi, L. M. (2016). Intersection of living in a rural versus urban area and race/ethnicity in explaining access to health care in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 106(8), 1463–1469.
Linder, J. A. & Levine, D. M. (2016). Health care communication technology and improved access, continuity, and relationships: The revolution will be Uberized. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(5), 643–644.
Guiding Questions – Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy
This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment. Do not turn in this document as your assessment submission.
Evaluate the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
- Based on the data that you used to identify your chosen issue in Assessment 1, what is the current state of the quality of care and outcomes?
- To what degree does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes need to be improved?
- How does the current performance compare to any relevant benchmarks?
- How does the current performance adversely impact the health of the target population?
Analyze how the current state of the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population necessitates health policy development and advocacy.
- How does the current state of the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population illustrate the need for improvements?
- Why do you consider policy development and advocacy necessary?
- How will developing a health policy help to improve the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?
- Why is advocating for health policy development necessary to drive improvements?
Justify why a developed policy will be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes for a specific issue in a target population.
- Why will your proposed policy (from Assessment 2) be vital in improving the quality of care and outcomes related to your chosen issue and target population?
- How will your proposed policy help drive improvements?
- What evidence or best-practices supports this? How does the evidence provide support?
- How will your proposed policy help drive improvements?
Advocate for policy development in other care settings with regard to a specific issue in a target population.
- Why is it important that policy development focused on your chosen issue and target population take place in care environments and settings beyond that for which you proposed the policy?
- How will wider development of policies help to drive improvements related to your chosen issue and target population?
- Ideally, what is the end result of wider policy development and implementation?
Analyze the ways in which interprofessional aspects of a developed policy will support efficient and effective achievement of desired outcomes for the target population.
- What are the relevant interprofessional aspects of your policy?
- How will these interprofessional aspects support efficient achievement of your desired outcomes for your target population?
- How will these interprofessional aspects support effective achievement of your desired outcomes for your target population?
Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
- Is your writing clear and professional?
- Is your writing free from errors?
- Is your writing persuasive?
- Does your submission conform to the format and length requirements of your chosen journal?
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references.
- Did you use 3–5 sources (or the number required by your chosen journal) in your assessment?
- Are the sources you used no more than five years old?
- Are your sources cited in APA format (or the journal’s preferred style) throughout your letter?
- Have you included an attached reference list?
- Did you follow the formatting guidelines of your chosen journal?
- Did you attach the submission and formatting guidelines for your chosen journal at the end of your assessment submission?