Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Veterans are among the populations that need to be given critical care in every healthcare facility within the United States. This population develops various health issues when serving the nation, and therefore they should not be left out when caring for vulnerable populations. The majority of U.S. military veterans live a challenging life due to the injuries they experienced during their military service. Such injuries contribute to chronic pain among the veterans, where they are prescribed opioids as the most appropriate medication to relieve pain (Leonard et al., 2021). However, due to their persistent pain, the veterans use the medication for a prolonged period leading to the addition of the drug.

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

The addiction contributes to other physical, emotional, and psychological impacts that make it challenging for the military to cope with their life situations. Some commit suicide due to the lack of medical support and intervention from the healthcare system of the country they served when they developed health issues. Since the veterans developed health issues while serving their nation, policies and guidelines need to be developed nationally to ensure that they access improved medical intervention to address their health issues. Therefore, various aspects regarding health policy proposal among veterans experiencing different health issues due to their increased use of opioids to manage their chronic pain have been discussed, including the proposed policy and guidelines, the need for the policy, and the use of the policy among the interprofessional team to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of high-quality health outcomes.

The Proposed Policy and Guidelines

The main aim of proposing a policy and guidelines among the veterans addicted to opioids due to their chronic pain is to provide improved efficient and effective holistic care. In this case, the best policy to achieve this goal involves providing free medical services to the veterans in any healthcare facility within the nation. The reason for free medical services is that most veterans may not afford to access care services due to their low financial condition. Most veterans visit different healthcare facilities seeking medical intervention to the extent that all money and property depletes due to the severity of their health issues. When they get in such a situation, most veterans may not afford care services anymore, leading to more suffering.

Besides, the reason for suggesting that the veterans should be provided with care services at any healthcare facility within the nation is because some of them may be experiencing severe physical, emotional, and psychological health issues to the extent that they may be unable to visit specified facilities, especially the veteran care centers. In such a situation, the veterans can visit any care facility, even within their localities.

Moreover, the guidelines necessary for improving the health condition among the veterans involve the use of a standardized method to assess the physical, emotional, and psychological conditions experienced by this population (Seal et al., 2017 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal). In this case, a standardized method will ensure that the healthcare providers in any facility where the veterans visit serve them according to findings from the standardized assessment.

The Need for the Policy (Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal )

According to research, more than half of U.S. veterans experience health issues associated with opioids use. The reason for using this substance is that it is considered the most appropriate medication to relieve severe pain. Most veterans who have served in a warzone or undergone extensive training experience severe chronic pain that continuously forces them to use the medication. Opioids are prepared in a way that they will cause addiction when used for a prolonged period (Frank et al., 2019). This is the reason why most of the veterans who use opioids are addicted to the drug. Addiction to opioids contributes to other health issues such as mental disorders, emotional issues, and physical effects of drug withdrawal. These issues have significantly affected the veterans to the extent that they cannot access care services. Therefore, there is a need to develop a policy that encourages this population to access care services within their residence.

Currently, veterans are provided with low-quality services since they only visit veteran healthcare centers to access care services at an affordable cost. Veterans who are unable to visit their specified facilities are forced to seek medical interventions from other care centers where they may not be recognized. Therefore, they end up being given little or no attention, leading to their deteriorated health issues. However, through the policy proposed, the veterans can be provided with quality health services in any care facility across the country with little or no cost. It is necessary to work towards improving the health outcomes of this population because they suffered while enhancing the security of the nation. Through the policy, any healthcare provider can serve the veterans to enhance holistic care regardless of whether or not the professional is meant to serve the military forces alone.

Enhancing High-Quality Outcomes using the Interprofessional Approach

Due to the emotional, physical, and psychological health issues that veterans experienced due to chronic pain and addiction to opioids, the interprofessional team members necessary for holistic care include the nurses, physicians, physical therapists, psychologists, and pharmacists. In this case, the nurses’ role is to educate the veterans on medical adherence and provide them with necessary care in various healthcare facilities. Besides, the role of the physicians is to treat any health issues evident due to chronic pain and opioids abuse (Buys et al., 2020). Moreover, the role of the physical therapists is to engage the veterans in various physical activities to strengthen their muscles, bones and refresh their minds, thus relieving the pain experienced in such areas. Furthermore, the role of the psychologists is to offer various cognitive therapies and counseling to health the mental disorders that the veterans may be experiencing. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal. Lastly, the role of the pharmacists is to prescribe alternative medications for the veterans to reduce their use of opioids, thus addressing their addictive issue.

The efficiency of these services can be enhanced through the proposed policy since the required interprofessional team members can be found in any healthcare facility across the nation. Therefore, the veterans can be provided with care services whenever they need them at any healthcare facility. Besides, the effectiveness of care services provided to the veterans will e enhanced since all the professionals mentioned play their roles based on their expertise. This implies that every healthcare professional will address only the issue that he or she has sufficient expertise, knowledge, and experience and leave other issues to be addressed by various care professionals. By so doing, the veterans will be provided with high-quality services that promote their health outcomes.

In conclusion, the veterans’ role in the nation during their military period is sufficient for policies and guidelines to be developed to promote their health conditions. In this case, the policy necessary to improve the health condition of the veterans involves the provision of free medical services at any healthcare facility within the nation. Besides, the guidelines necessary involve the use of a standardized health condition assessment method. In this case, the interprofessional team is critical for health promotion among the population.

References for Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Buys, M. J., Bayless, K., Romesser, J., Anderson, Z., Patel, S., Zhang, C., … & Brooke, B. S. (2020). Opioid use among veterans undergoing major joint surgery managed by a multidisciplinary transitional pain service. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, 45(11), 847-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101797

Frank, J. W., Carey, E., Nolan, C., Kerns, R. D., Sandbrink, F., Gallagher, R., & Ho, P. M. (2019). Increased non-opioid chronic pain treatment in the veterans’ health administration, 2010–2016. Pain Medicine, 20(5), 869-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny149

Leonard, C., Ayele, R., Ladebue, A., McCreight, M., Nolan, C., Sandbrink, F., & Frank, J. W. (2021). Barriers to and Facilitators of Multimodal Chronic Pain Care for Veterans: A National Qualitative Study. Pain Medicine, 22(5), 1167-1173. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaa312

Seal, K., Becker, W., Tighe, J., Li, Y., & Rife, T. (2017). Managing chronic pain in primary care: it does take a village. Journal of general internal medicine, 32(8), 931-934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4047-5

Assessment 2 Instructions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

  • Develop a 2-4 page policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen health care issue and target population. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

As a master’s-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice.

By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations.

Professional Context

As a master’s-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health ­care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health ­care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice.

By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Scenario

The analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.

This assessment will build upon your previous Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations assessment. If, for some reason, you wish to change your specific issue or target population, contact your faculty for approval. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Instructions

For this assessment, you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen health care issue and target population. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [DOC] to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal
    • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
    • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Example assessment: You may use the Assessment 2 Example [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Submission Requirements

    • Length of proposal: 2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive. No abstract is required.
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
    • APA formatting: Use the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX]. An APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your proposal.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

    • Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.
      • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal
      • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
    • Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
      • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
      • Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style. Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Sample 2

Policy Proposal And Guidelines To Improved Outcomes And Quality Of Geriatric Cancer Patients

The United States’ aging population is quickly increasing, with the majority of older persons suffering from chronic and chronic diseases such as cancer. Because of their age, financial status, and comorbidities, elderly cancer patients are a vulnerable population that frequently faces difficulties getting effective care (Abyad & Hammami, 2021). This policy proposal aims to improve the outcomes for older cancer patients by guaranteeing equal access to treatment, providing comprehensive care that meets their specific requirements, and encouraging early diagnosis and preventive initiatives (Mizutani et al., 2019).

A crucial part of the quality proposal is ensuring fair access to care for older cancer patients. This may be accomplished by deploying telemedicine and mobile health technologies, enabling patients to communicate remotely with clinicians. This strategy will assist in alleviating the strain of transportation and mobility concerns on senior patients, boosting access to treatment. Furthermore, there is a need to enhance financing for programs that offer affordable care to low-income older people. This can be accomplished by offering tax breaks to healthcare groups that provide low-cost services to elderly cancer patients.

Another aspect of this policy idea is to provide comprehensive care tailored to the specific requirements of older cancer patients. This can be accomplished by forming multidisciplinary care teams comprised of geriatricians, oncologists, social workers, and other healthcare providers. These teams will collaborate to develop individualized care plans for older cancer patients that address their physical, emotional, and social requirements. Palliative care should also be encouraged to treat symptoms and enhance the quality of life (Sourdet et al., 2020). Increasing financing for cancer screening programs, providing educational resources on the significance of early detection, and establishing policies that encourage frequent cancer screenings for older populations can all help to promote early detection and preventive efforts for elderly cancer patients. Early identification and prevention will result in improved treatment results and higher survival rates for older cancer patients.

Advocating For The Proposed Policy

The aging population in the United States is growing, and with it, so is the prevalence of cancer. Cancer is one of the top causes of mortality in the elderly population; thus, addressing the issue of quality care for this group is critical. Older people may have several comorbidities and need specialist treatment (Miller et al., 2019). Although breakthroughs in treatment, discrepancies in care for the aged population persist, and a recommended policy to address these disparities is required. One of the primary causes of treatment discrepancies is a lack of consistency in geriatric oncology care.

Considering their individual requirements and comorbidities, a systematic strategy for caring for older cancer patients is required. This policy proposal seeks to standardize geriatric oncology treatment by creating evidence-based guidelines. The recommendations are created in consultation with geriatric oncology experts, primary care physicians, and other interested parties. The proposals include screening and evaluation, treatment, and supportive care.

Another critical part of the proposed policy is the need for better communication among healthcare practitioners, patients, and carers. Communication is critical in ensuring that patients receive the best treatment possible, especially older cancer patients (Miller et al., 2019). The policy proposal would oblige healthcare practitioners to offer patients and caregivers clear and straightforward information. This information would include the diagnosis, treatment choices, and probable adverse effects. It would also necessitate communication among healthcare practitioners to guarantee that patients receive thorough and coordinated treatment.

The proposed regulation will oblige healthcare practitioners to consider the patient’s preferences and values when making decisions. Older cancer patients frequently have distinct values and goals that must be considered in therapeutic decision-making. This would entail speaking with patients and caregivers about their treatment choices and quality of life (Sourdet et al., 2020). Based on the policy proposal, healthcare practitioners must document these interactions in the patient’s medical record and incorporate them into the treatment plan.

Analysis Of The Potential For An Interprofessional Approach To Implementing A Proposed Policy To Increase The Efficiency Or Effectiveness Of The Care Setting To Achieve High-Quality Outcomes

To ensure the success of the proposed policy, interprofessional teams must collaborate and communicate with one another. An interprofessional approach to policy implementation can improve the care setting’s efficiency and efficacy, resulting in high-quality outcomes for the target population. Effective communication is a crucial interprofessional best practice. Clear and concise communication, active listening, and open feedback are all required for the effectiveness of the policy proposal. Effective communication ensures that all team members understand the policy’s purpose, aims, and objectives (Sourdet et al., 2020). Active listening enables team members to comprehend each other’s viewpoints and detect potential implementation issues.

Open feedback fosters a collaborative atmosphere in which healthcare workers may express constructive criticism while also identifying areas for development. Again, interprofessional education is critical because it prepares healthcare workers from many disciplines to work cooperatively in patient care. This technique allows healthcare workers to better grasp each other’s roles, responsibilities, and areas of expertise. Interprofessional education fosters the development of teamwork, communication, and problem-solving abilities, all of which are required for policy implementation. Healthcare workers may establish a practical, effective, and efficient action plan by recognizing the value of collaboration.

Shared decision-making is a collaborative process in which healthcare professionals and patients work together to make decisions about their treatment. This approach acknowledges patient preferences and values and encourages healthcare providers to collaborate with patients to make informed decisions about their care. Collaborative decision-making encourages patient-centered care, which is critical for delivering high-quality results (Sourdet et al., 2020). When healthcare providers include patients in decision-making, they may deliver personalized treatment that is tailored to the patient’s exact requirements.

Conclusion

The proposed policy for enhancing outcomes for older cancer patients through collaborative care has the potential to influence the quality of treatment for this vulnerable group substantially. The interprofessional approach guarantees that all care team members collaborate to offer complete, patient-centered care. Implementing evidence-based methods, patient education and communication among team members are critical to the policy’s effectiveness. Implementing the proposed policy necessitates a willingness to adapt and collaborate toward a common objective. High-quality outcomes for the target population can be accomplished by enhancing efficiency and effectiveness in the care setting. Interprofessional best practices, including shared decision-making, clear communication, and collaborative care planning, can result in higher patient satisfaction, fewer hospital readmissions, and better cancer management.

References

Abyad, A., & Hammami, S. O. (2021). Geriatric medicine in the Arab world. In Handbook of Healthcare in the Arab World (pp. 2149–2176). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36811-1_86

Miller, K. D., Nogueira, L., Mariotto, A. B., Rowland, J. H., Yabroff, K. R., Alfano, C. M., Jemal, A., Kramer, J. L., & Siegel, R. L. (2019). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 69(5), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21565

Mizutani, T., Nakamura, K., Fukuda, H., Ogawa, A., Hamaguchi, T., Nagashima, F., & Geriatric Study Committee/Japan Clinical Oncology Group. (2019). Geriatric Research Policy: Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) policy. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 49(10), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyz093

Sourdet, S., Brechemier, D., Steinmeyer, Z., Gerard, S., & Balardy, L. (2020). Impact of the comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decision in geriatric oncology. BMC Cancer, 20(1), 384. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-06878-2