NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment

NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment

NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment

Work Environment Assessment

A sustainable business environment is a critical factor in the management of business organizations. The health of an organization is measured by the level of civility. Civility is gauged by parameters such as teamwork, the level of employee engagement, communication, and other best management practices (Clark et al., 2011). Organizations must from time to time assess the work environment to measure the level of civility.

ORDER NOW 

Theory or concept presented in the article selected.

NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment

Hofstede’s theory of management is based on certain dimensions upon which cultural values can be evaluated or analyzed to gauge how civil an organization is. Hofstede’s original theory was based on four parameters such as individualism and collectivity, avoidance and uncertainty, masculinity and femininity, and power distance (Prabowo et al., 2018) There have been some amendments to Hofstede’s original theory, however; his work remains one of the most important models for studying cross-cultural management in organizations. Critical parameters that Hofstede talks about in his model to cross-cultural management are the importance of international communication especially in organizations such as apple which have many employees from different cultural backgrounds.

Hofstede asserts that communication is usually one of the most challenging factors in an organization and that the issue is further compounded in organizations that have many employees from different backgrounds. According to Hofstede, the challenge in communication in a cross-cultural organization lies in the fact that an organization must take into consideration cross-cultural differences (Silva et al., 2018).

Just like in communication, cross-cultural organizations also experience problems when it comes to management because cross-culture impacts decision-making. For example, Apple which has for some time made China its second home must consider the country’s customs and values when making decisions (Xian, 2020). Even in the United States where Apple is headquartered, the company has many employees from different backgrounds culturally which it has to be careful within many ways so that all employees are considered at the organization.

Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory for NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment

Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory is a critical assessment tool of the workplace. This tool measures critical parameters such as whether the members of an organization share their organizations, mission, vision, trust, and respect based on a collective effort (Rosen et al., 2018). This tool also measures whether there is a good level of trust between employees of all cadres-from top management to the lowest level. Communication is also an important parameter in evaluating the level of an organization’s civility level. Broken communication means that an organization is facing challenges whereas positive communication means that there is a good level of trust, transparency, and respect.

Things that Surprised Me

One of the things I found surprising from the results is that many healthcare facilities put more emphasis on profitability instead of their worker’s welfare. Poor employee engagement directly affects patient outcomes. I work for a private healthcare facility that cares mostly about how many patients are treated daily, the more the better because of profitability. This system means that nurses work overtime and work under a lot of pressure to meet the demands of all patients. This factor has strained the working relationship between the nurses and the management leading to incivility.

How My Organization Can Apply the Theory in the Selected Article

To promote civility, my organization must adopt the approach of balancing its needs with the needs of the workers. Just like profits is important to the organization, so is personal growth and fair treatment is to employees. Fair treatment and a conducive work environment boost the level of civility in organizations (Clark, 2015). Motivation is essential in getting quality work from employees, increasing employee productivity, and enhancing their speed of productivity.

Effective leadership works hand in hand with motivation. Where there is poor leadership, employees become confused, demotivated, and ‘directionless.’ Similarly, without proper motivation, employees cannot give their best, resulting in low and reduced productivity. Effective leaders motivate their employees by creating a friendly work environment, encouraging positive communication, and promoting creativity (Prabowo, Noermijati, & Irawanto, 2018, p. 171). Based on this analogy, my organization should increase the level of employee motivation to improve workplace civility.

My organization should also promote communication between workers. Teamwork and individual behavior can make healthcare safer for patients as it improves the quality of care given to patients. As mentioned above, members of staff that are in good communication with each other are not only motivated but are also likely to avoid many errors when dealing with patients (Rosen, et al., 2018, p. 433).

Effective communication boosts the morale of the staff making them highly productive. A healthcare organization that has an effective communication structure in place is likely to be more successful with regards to patient outcomes and safety compared to one with poor communication structures. Moreover, effective communication promotes efficiency leading to improved outcomes both for the organization and the employees.

Conclusion

Civility is a critical factor in the management of health organizations. Organizations can measure civility by conducting a workplace assessment. Such assessments are aimed at finding the level of employee engagement, employee satisfaction, communication, teamwork, and other practices that boost civility in the workplace.

References for NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Assessment

Prabowo, T. S., Noermijati, N., & Irawanto, D. W. (2018). The influence of transformational leadership and work motivation on employee performance mediated by job satisfaction. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(1), 171-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.01.20

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330.

Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018). Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care. American Psychologist, 73(4), 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000298

Silva, S. D., & Mendis, B. A. K. M. (2017). Relationship between transformational, transaction and laissez-faire leadership styles and employee commitment. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(7), 13-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334494910

Xian, J., Li, B., & Huang, H. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Thriving at Work: The Mediating Roles of Challenge-Hindrance Stressors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01400

Module 4: Assignment WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

RESOURCES

LEARNING RESOURCES

Required Readings

  • Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader(3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
    • Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: It Is All About Working Together (pp. 155–178)
    • Chapter 8, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 237–272)
    • Chapter 7, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 212–231)

Select at least ONE of the following:

Required Media

Transcript already sent

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
  • Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
  • Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
    • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
    • Clark (2018)
    • Clark (2015)
    • Griffin and Clark (2014)

*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
  • Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
  • Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
  • Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

  • Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
  • Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

  • Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9

Submit your Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK9Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric – NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 1: Work Environment Assessment *Template, completed in the week 7 discussion, should not be submitted with this assignment · Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace. · Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. · Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.
45 to >40.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. … The responses thoroughly and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. … The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

40 to >35.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace. … The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed. … The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.

35 to >31.0 pts

Fair

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate. … The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate. … The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.

31 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. … The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. … The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 2: Reviewing the Literature · Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. · Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. · Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
15 to >13.0 pts

Excellent

The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. … The responses accurately and completely explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. … The responses accurately and thoroughly explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. … Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

13 to >11.0 pts

Good

The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected. … The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment. … The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. … Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.

11 to >10.0 pts

Fair

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate. … The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate. … The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate. … Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.

10 to >0 pts

Poor

The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. … The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. … The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. … Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams · Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment. · Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

Using the literature, the responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. … The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good

Using the literature, the responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment. … The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy. … The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.

13 to >0 pts

Poor

Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing. … The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Resource Synthesis
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts
Total Points: 100

PreviousNext