Subject Matter Experts and Data Collection Example Paper
Subject Matter Experts and Data Collection
The necessity for evidence-based practices has contributed to the continuous upsurge for consistence application of data collection tools, aimed at supporting medical perception interventions. The instruments helps in developing of consistent interventions, and therefore promoting the efficacy of determining the quality of healthcare and instituting procedures for decision-making processes (Schobel et al., 2016 Subject Matter Experts and Data Collection Example Paper). These features help in enhancing the capability of healthcare workers in providing justifiable and quality services to all without discrimination. Besides, the tools helps in providing means of supporting people’s needs based on different susceptibilities touching on given populations. As a result, the following paper delves into creating a data collection tool, which can help to facilitate healthcare workers in making medical decision and highlighting best approaches in implementing different community health programs.
A Data Collection Kit
The main purpose of this kit is to collect data used for highlighting best approaches in implementing different community health programs. This purpose is achieved through surveying, interviewing, and a section comprising of questions. As such, it can help in collecting qualitative and quantitative data on risky sexual behaviors as shown below. The tabulation of the tool is determined by the need for clarity, aesthetic enhancement, and the quality of presentation required.
|Risk Category 0 Risk Category Risk Category 2
|How many sexual partners
do you have?
|Have you ever slept with a
person on the
|Have you ever had sex with someone after meeting in a
|How often do you have unexpected sexual
|Have you ever regretted after a sexual
|How often do you have vaginal sex without
|Do you prefer using condoms on the first encounter or
|How often do you discuss sex
with your partner (s)
|Have you ever
had anal sex without a condom?
|Do you prefer unprotected anal penetration or
|Do you opts for both anal and
vaginal sex at all times?
|Do you enjoys
role play and domination
|Have you ever had more than three sexual encounters with uncommitted
|Have you ever Had sex with more than two untested
An Overview of the Data Collection Tool
Palpably, the main intent of developing the above tool is to collect data on risky sexual behavior, the primary target being young adults. The tool can be used in promoting public health program aimed at curbing STIs. The risk category 0 is used in identifying persons with healthy sexual behaviors, while the risk category 1 and 2 are used in identifying people with irresponsible sexual behaviors. Besides collecting primary data, the above kit can also be used in aggregating data for drawing a general conclusion on sexual conduct in a given society.
A Critical Review of the Tool
The assessment of the tool kit was done by conducting three different interviews with public health nurses. The identification of the nurses as the appropriate pool of the subject matter experts was based on their knowledge in programs aimed at promoting common health among the public on preventive nursing involvements in promoting the general health of people.
Public health nurses were identified as the appropriate pool of subject matter experts, because of the expertise on community health promotion programs and the focus on preventive nursing interventions to promote the overall wellbeing of the population. The outcomes from the interview were then combined to determine common themes.
The account of the kit validates unequivocal objectives, and therefore giving the users a generalized gestalt and prospects of the data collected. It was proven that the content of the kit was consistent with the objectives of validating the dominance of risky sexual conducts within the targeted population. This is principally important since a data collection kit must make available objective data, which promotes the dependability and rationality of the tool. The data was found to be common and hence, can be used by diverse health healthcare workers and stakeholders in facilitating the process of making evidence-based decision.
In terms of the precision of the data collected, the kit was found to be accurate and precise, due to the fact that the content showed specific aspects of ghoulish sexual behaviors within the target audience, and therefore showing that it can generate the data for the intended uses. The nature of inquiries can help in determining the accuracy of the tool, which indicated a certain aspect of classification of sexual behavior in the given society. Additionally, the classification of the occurrence of sexual behaviors can help in developing measures or programs aimed at addressing specific features associated with unhealthy behaviors in a community.
Although the tool was found to be relatively easy to use among the nurses, it lacked some critical elements for classification of data. Data showing ethnicity and sexual preference among the target population can be helpful in establishing vulnerabilities in the society. Besides, the tool does not include the age of an individual, which is an important factor in this case. In terms of versatility, the kit was found to be too general and limited. The tool also shows some interest in specified unhealthy sexual conduct, as a result of lack of divergent group items of inquiries for highlighting specific themes of the data. These gaps in the tool can result in a partial view of the underlying issues, which can be misleading. Misleading results may have adverse impacts on the quality of healthcare, and may lead to wastage of healthcare resources (Li et al., 2015 Subject Matter Experts and Data Collection Example Paper). As a result ensuring that the tool used in data collection is comprehensive and as complete as possible is essential in avoiding the gaps in the final results. The tool also failed to include ethical consideration, which is an essential aspect of collecting primary data from the population. Collecting such data requires consent from the participants, as well as a brief and simple description of the how the data collected will be used. According to subject matter experts, this is crucial in the bid to enhance the credibility of the tool. It was also determined that the tool did not include information describing its use and expected outcomes. Including such information might help in ensuring the tool is used for the purpose it was intended for. Descriptive information may also help in improving the accuracy of the data collected, and also make it easy to use. In terms of data collected, the tool can be classified as ambiguous, since it is not clear whether the data collected is based on observation on interview (Colorafi & Evans, 2016). Also, the tool failed to include scale interpretation and guidelines for assessing its effectiveness. The interview also revealed that there are several elements that can help in measuring the quality of the tool as well as the data collected. Some of the major factors that were identified as crucial in determining the quality of data collected include the nature of the data, objectives of collecting the data, and the use of the tool (Fernandez, 2009). Based on this, ensuring that goals established are clear and well defined is essential in establishing the quality and efficiency of the tool used in data collection.
Notably, the main areas of enhancement acknowledged indicate that the structure of the tool will eventually change. In order to include the ethical consideration aspects and tool descriptive information, it is essential to introduce a new section. It also important to include new sections for collecting data on the gender, sexual orientation, sexuality of the respondents, as well as age and background. Collecting such information can help in classification of individuals based on supposed susceptibility, augmenting the capacity of developing tailored public health interventions. A description on the application of the tool can also help in promoting effectual applications. This information helps in giving directions on the application of tool in collecting quality and resourceful data. The healthcare workers can use such data to easily determine the aptness of the tool. Besides, the inclusion of supplementary info helps the user in understanding the weaknesses and strengths of the tool, and therefore making it more useful.
As well, common themes will also be presented, which will make it easy collect data on specific sexual behaviors, including risk of STIs, violence, etc. This will help to improve the accuracy of the tool and also create a definite impression. The results will help in improving the entirety and exhaustiveness of the tool, while ensuring an interpretation scale is included for showing how the collected data can be inferred in the bid to achieve the primary objectives. Additionally, the content need fine-tuning, which will be essential in generating unique data, which is critical in improving the efficiency of making decision and developing intervention measures. Besides, including more information regarding the required information will also help in changing the overall structure of the tool. This will help in redefining and establishing the extent to which respondents can agree or disagree with the statement regarding a certain item. This will help in providing a more precise presentation and understandings of the data collected.
In conclusion, data collection tool kits are indispensible in evidence-based practices for their capacity to institute facts supporting medical decisions. The main purpose of this kit is to collect data used for highlighting best approaches in implementing different community health programs. The purpose is achieved through surveying, interviewing, and a section comprising of questions. This shows the importance of understanding the process of creating a simple and tailored data collection tools among health care workers in the bid to support clinical decisions. Nevertheless, there is need for the tool to be comprehensive, and as complete as possible to help in developing reliable evidence-based interventions.
References for Subject Matter Experts and Data Collection Example Paper
Colorafi, K. J., & Evans, B. (2016). Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16-25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26791375/
Fernandez, R. E. (2009). U.S. Patent No. 7,519,622. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Li, T., Vedula, S. S., Hadar, N., Parkin, C., Lau, J., & Dickersin, K. (2015). Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med, 162(4), 287-94.
Schobel, J., Pryss, R., Schickler, M., & Reichert, M. (2016, June). Towards flexible mobile data collection in healthcare. In 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) (pp. 181-182). IEEE.