Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Paper

Patient safety and healthcare service quality are inseparable elements. More importantly, efforts to ensure safe healthcare processes, reduce health hazards, and empower employees to enhance effective services are gaining popularity in healthcare contexts. The growing concern about patient safety emanates from the urge to eliminate process errors, patient injuries, and medical/economic burdens associated with workplace injuries.

This safety improvement plan toolkit targets to expound on workplace safety parameters and provide insights about leadership obligations, potential strategies, and efforts to harness safe healthcare processes. It is divided into fundamental sections like a general overview of patient safety, leadership commitment, stakeholder involvement, Worksite hazard analysis, hazard prevention and control, stakeholders training, and emphasizing compliance safety procedures.

Annotated Bibliography

An Overview of Patient Safety

World Health Organization. (2019). Patient Safety. Accessed 24^th March 2021 From https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety

This publication by the World Health Organization is essential in providing in-depth explanations regarding the growing concern of patient safety. The source defines patient safety as an organizational priority that emerges with the evolving complexities in healthcare systems. By definition, patient safety encompasses efforts to prevent and reduce risks, errors, and harm that compromise patients’ health.

World Health Organization (WHO) perceives institutional and patient safety as prerequisites for quality healthcare services. Alongside evaluating the essentiality of patient safety interventions supporting the urge for quality healthcare, this source provides key facts regarding the global burden inflicted by patient injuries while under the care of health professionals.

According to the publication, over 134 million adverse events occur in hospitals in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to unsafe working conditions and processes. These events contribute to over 2.6 million deaths annually. Alongside deaths, patient injuries result in disabilities that further inflict health and economic burden to individuals, families, communities, institutions, and countries.

The resource outlines possible patient safety measures and recommends possible improvement strategies like setting clear policies, establishing leadership capacity, adopting data-driven safety improvement measures, and fostering patient and employees’ engagement in these policies. In the overall attempts to establish a holistic safety improvement plan toolkit, this publication will be essential to inspire research considering that WHO is one of the most reputable organizations that advocate for institutional measures for patient and employees’ safety.

Leadership Commitment in Embracing Safety Improvement Measures

Drew, J., & Pandit, M. (2020). Why healthcare leadership should embrace quality improvement. BMJ, m872. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m872

In this paper, Drew et al. (2020) examine the essentiality of leadership and Managerial involvement in efforts to foster workplace safety. More importantly, top management helms’ inputs in addressing unfavorable working conditions, poor infrastructures, and other essential aspects to uphold patients’ safety.

The authors agree that the top leadership or healthcare institutions assume the mantle of spearheading organizational goals, including the most profound one, the realizations of quality healthcare services. According to this source, quality and safety improvement should be deeply-embedded in leadership styles and daily operations. As the dream of fostering quality healthcare services becomes more realistic for healthcare organizations, there is a need to replace traditional, hierarchical, and compromising structures that ignore patient safety’s roles in upholding quality objectives.

These are direct relationships between management/leadership styles and process quality or safety. For instance, institutional top leadership faces the challenges of asserting authority and establish collective, inclusive, and compassionate tenures. Addressing these constraints requires the surrender of autocratic leadership styles to accommodate more cooperative, interactive, and collaborative approaches.

With a focus of fostering safe healthcare processes and services, leaders should define and follow various standards, embedded safety in workplace cultures, empower staff and employees, conceptualize action plans, and communicate missions, expectations, and strategic goals. Also, embedding quality and safety improvement measures in any Organization requires strategic intent, workforce investment programs, appropriate framework models, and reliable information-sharing mechanisms that deconstruct the traditional top-down approach. This source is relevant in presenting the essentiality of leadership commitment in enhancing patient safety and quality improvement strategies. More importantly, in establishing managerial expectations when streamlining safety improvement plan toolkit in institutional contexts.

Farokhzadian, J., Dehghan, N. N., & Borhani, F. (2018). The long way ahead to achieve an effective patient safety culture: challenges perceived by nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3467-1

This qualitative study focuses on establishing the importance of creating an effective workplace culture that upholds safety improvement measures, policies, commitment, and strategies. The source presents patient safety as a new and emerging phenomenon with shreds of historical evidence. The background developments to support the patient safety concept trace back to more than 150 years ago when Florence Nightingale argued that “the very first requirement in a hospital is to do no harm for patients.” Although shallow, these contentions are proving decisive recently.

For instance, modern advances and complexities in the healthcare sector contribute to serious healthcare and patient safety deficiencies. The authors contend that increased prevalence in clinical risks, safety incidents, and patient injuries increase organizational concerns and call for collective efforts to protect patients and employees from adverse effects.

Noteworthy is that the data behind patient injuries are overwhelming because 1 in 10 patients obtains injury during healthcare processes. With many injuries and safety-related deaths emanating from preventable and avoidable healthcare situations, developing effective workplace culture is among the most profound efforts to combat these constraints.

According Farokhzadian, Dehghan and Borhani (2018), safety culture accommodates different elements such as teamwork, leadership support, behavioral transformation, appropriate reporting, benchmarking activities, and effective communication mechanisms. Hospital managers and leaders should harmonize these elements to bring about comprehensive, holistic, reliable, and meaningful safety improvement plan toolkit. This source is crucial in presenting leadership obligations and roles in facilitating quality healthcare services by developing proper institutional cultures. It empowers the knowledge about multiple internal aspects that contribute to safety improvement strategies.

Lawati, M., Dennis, S., Short, S., & Abdulhadi, N. (2018). Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7

This systematic review of the existing literature aims at presenting a comprehensive review of the existing literature on safety culture and patient safety. The research presents data obtained from reputable healthcare websites such as Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, and EMBASE. More importantly, the researchers embarked on a holistic review of over 3000 papers and extracted data from 28 papers. The reviewed articles were from the US, Germany, the United Kingdom, Australia, Netherlands, Brazil, Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia.

The source recalls the World Health Organization’s definition of patient safety as “the prevention of errors and adverse effects to patient associated with health care” and “to do no harm to patients.” Although these definitions are fundamental in presenting organizational requirements and obligations for ensuring patient safety, millions of patients suffer from disabilities, injuries, and deaths that originate from unsafe medical practices. The economic and health burdens inflicted by safety issues led to wider recognition of the essentiality of patient safety and the subsequent incorporation of quality improvement measures to mainstream healthcare activities.

Precisely, Lawati et al. (2018) defines safety culture as shared values, perceptions, competencies, attitudes, and behaviors within an institution that defines how practitioners uphold effective processes, perceive hazards and control aspects that compromise safety and process quality. According to multinational reviews presented by this research, medical safety elements emanate from diagnosis and treatment, errors in communication, unreliable patient-doctor relationships, and poor reporting mechanisms.

Further, the study evaluates the Hospital Survey’s effectiveness on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC) to foster patient safety and quality services. The source is reliable in presenting how diverse scholarly works across countries combine to underscore patient safety’s significance in enhancing quality healthcare services. Therefore, it is essential to provide a wealth of knowledge to nurses and other medical practitioners who perceive providing quality care to patients.

Patient and Employee Engagement in Safety Policies

Sharma, A., Rivadeneira, N., Barr-Walker, J., Stern, R., Johnson, A., & Sarkar, U. (2018). Patient Engagement in Health Care Safety: An Overview of Mixed-Quality Evidence. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1813-1820. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0716

This paper provides an overview of mixed-quality evidence supporting patients’ and caregivers’ engagement in healthcare safety. The study appreciates that many review articles and studies underscore the importance of involving patients and caregivers such as family members in healthcare safety strategies. The authors adopted multiple reviews of 2795 references, where 52 articles met full-text inclusion criteria. The shreds of evidence in these articles supported patients’ participation and their inputs to enhancing safety improvement in different healthcare contexts.

According to this research paper, patients are willing to form engagements in a wide array of healthcare settings. Patients participating in programs to enhance safety healthcare services may embrace various activities that include monitoring and self-administration Interventions, alerting caregivers about symptoms, and reporting adverse effects. A perfect example of a scenario where patients and family members promote safety is during home-based care.

According to Sharma et al. (2018 Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Paper), the management of chronic diseases under the home-based care programs provides chances for patients and family members to cooperate with medical practitioners through timely communication, alerting, and reporting the progress.

Further, the study exposes that patients improve safety by adopting self-monitoring of anticoagulation medication and participating in self-management with patient-oriented teaching or counseling programs. In this sense, healthcare providers empower home-based patients to understand healthcare services, monitor medication progress, and report any potential danger that may impede service quality. This source is reputable in providing insights about patients’ and family members’ roles in contributing to safety improvement programs.

Wagner, A., Rieger, M., Manser, T., Sturm, H., Hardt, J., Martus, P., Lessing, C., & hammer, A. (2019). Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7

This cross-sectional study aims at establishing the nature of nurses’ engagement in facilitating safety improvement measures. The researchers conducted the study using a standardized paper-based questionnaire. The research targeted nurses and physicians to investigate several aspects: scales of leadership and transformational management, occupational safety climate, and physiological attributes obtained from different working conditions.

With a total of 995 completed questionnaires out of 2512 distributed ones, the study disclosed that physicians rated psychosocial working conditions and safety issues more effectively than nurses. Considering occupational safety and workplace risks, nurses indicated higher risks than physicians (Wagner et al., 2019).

These results are meaningful in establishing the nature of interactions between nurses, physicians, and patients. In many instances, nurses are closer to patients than physicians. Therefore, they bear the mantle to foster quality care by establishing proper and patient-oriented relationships to fasten recovery processes and promote patients’ satisfaction. With the existing close connections between nurses and patients, it is possible to utilize these relationships to promote safety climate and healthcare institutions’ cultures.

According to Wagner et al. (2019), organizations with proper safety culture anchor communication with mutual trust shared perceptions, and confidence in preventive measures’ efficacy. Although nurses and other healthcare practitioners operate to realize process efficiency and healthcare quality, modern hospitals’ dynamic nature subjects them to psychological challenges and other problems such as skill shortage, increasing workloads, and complex tasks.

Alongside these internal aspects, demographic changes and external factors inflict more challenges to the healthcare professionals. Therefore, top leadership should take the central role to involve professionals in safety improvement measures and address issues that compromise quality healthcare. The paper is adequate in presenting the role of nurses and other practitioners in promoting a safe culture.

Worksite Analysis

Eijkelenboom, A., & Bluyssen, P. (2019). Comfort and health of patients and staff, related to the physical environment of different departments in hospitals: a literature review. Intelligent Buildings International, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2019.1613218

This study reviewed the existing literature from reputable scientific websites like Scopus, Web of Science, and JSTOR. The primary emphasis was to concentrate on architecture, the indoor environment, and environmental psychology. The paper’s primary objective was to underscore the essentiality of evaluating physical environments or workplace tangible elements that may affect the occupants’ health and comfort (staff, patient, and visitors).

The source acknowledges the increasing demand for healthcare, driven by the aging population and high percentage of people suffering from chronic diseases. Due to such issues in the modern healthcare contexts, there is a need to understand environmental stimuli and physical elements that may lead to injuries, discomfort, and even deaths. Environmental aspects like noise, crowding stressors may lead to workplace stress, compromised healthcare quality, and unfavorable working conditions.

According to Eijkelenboom and Bluyssen (2019 Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Paper), when striving to identify various environmental aspects like architectural design, indoor environment, and environmental psychology, the authors of these sources adopted search techniques that accommodated keywords such as wellbeing, stress, comfort, pain, layout, and patient rooms. These keywords facilitated access to reliable articles and other scholarly resources to influence research outcomes.

The inclusion criteria for the selected articles include original peer-reviewed articles written in English, field studies on comfort or health-related indicators such as architectural design, and articles of diverse study designs such as controlled trials, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, or descriptive studies. This literature review research justifies workplace analysis’s significance to establish possible hazards emanating from architectural design and environmental stimuli.

Manzanera, R., Moya, D., Guilabert, M., Plana, M., Gálvez, G., Ortner, J., & Mira, J. (2018). Quality Assurance and Patient Safety Measures: A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(8), 1568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15081568

This comparative longitudinal analysis establishes the relationships between safety culture assessments and quality assurance plans. The researchers targeted to evaluate Quality Assurance (QA) by adopting 24 questions for professionals. The evaluation questions covered diverse areas such as strategies (safety and quality strategies), indicators (feedback and risk maps), equipment (adequacy), patient-oriented care (respect to values, perceptions, and backgrounds), cost-effective treatments, and other parameters like follow-up activities and evidence-based processes that guarantee healthcare quality. The source presents various findings regarding the above research subjects.

The baseline contentions regarding the longitudinal analysis include underscoring the importance of workplace analysis to determine the extent of quality assurance plans, present the leadership roles in promoting quality actions and positive perceptions of quality assurance among healthcare employees, and introduce procedural changes to facilitate favorable workplace culture (Manzanera et al., 2018).

The study concludes that systematic professional participation in assessing the effectiveness of the quality plans and safety cultures provides opportunities for purposeful monitoring of deployment degrees and proposed improvements. The source is reliable in presenting the need for proper workplace analysis to establish the degree and effectiveness of quality assurance indicators in the institutional contexts.

Mort, E., Bruckel, J., Donelan, K., Paine, L., Rosen, M., & Thompson, D., Weaver, S., Yagoda, D., & Pronovost, P. (2016). Improving Health Care Quality and Patient Safety Through Peer-to-Peer Assessment: Demonstration Project in Two Academic Medical Centers. American Journal of Medical Quality, 32(5), 472-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860616673709

This experimental study presents a new organizational approach to improve patient safety and realize quality improvement. The researchers proposed a peer-to-peer assessment technique to evaluate, respond and address issues that affect patient quality. Subsequently, Mort et al. (2016) developed the frameworks and applied them in 2 reputable academic hospitals in the eastern United States: John Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).

The peer-to-peer assessment framework comprised various elements that include establishing organizational/leadership structure, evaluating profound quality measures, and reflecting on the safety measures applied in the last 12 months. The establishment of the two academic hospitals’ leadership structures entailed reviews on the existing reporting mechanisms, the establishment of mission, vision, and value statements, and evaluating quality/safety programs. On the other hand, the researchers evaluated the recent quality measures that include surgical quality improvement program quality measures, providers and systems, and additional frequently applicable metrics.

Regarding reviews on the recent safety measures applied in the two hospitals, Mort et al. (2016) evaluated the latest safety event data, trends, and established safety culture survey findings. The research paper underscores the significance of assessing organizational tools and methods to determine how organizations approach crucial quality and safety measures such as governance, accountability, communication, measurement, and infrastructure.

This paper is fundamental in contributing to healthcare knowledge and understanding possible assessment methods that may establish organizational safety and quality improvement programs. The application of the peer-to-peer method is crucial in establishing multisystem approaches that inspire patient safety and quality healthcare services.

Policies for Hazard Prevention and Control

Subramaniam, C., Mohd. Shamsudin, F., Mohd Zin, M., Sri Ramalu, S., & Hassan, Z. (2016). Safety management practices and safety compliance in small-medium enterprises. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 8(3), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-02-2016-0029

This paper presents findings from a survey of 74 employees of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) in Peninsular Malaysia. The survey targeted establishing safety participation as a mediator in the interactions between six elements of safety management approaches (safety training, workers’ participation and feedback, safety procedures, compliance, management commitment, and promotion services). Although the research paper does not touch on the healthcare sector, it provides universal policy guidelines for organizational safety and quality improvement. According to the study, occupational incidents and subsequent injuries emanate from human errors. Therefore, it recommends behavioral-based approaches to prevent injuries and control losses.

The researchers define organizational safety management programs from perspectives of approaches, policies, strategies, frameworks, and activities by institutions to prevent occupational hazards and injuries—one of the most profound policies for safety and quality improvement in safety training. Effective training and job facilitation activities provide accident prevention and control by enlightening workers about safety rules and procedures (Subramaniam et al., 2016). Similarly, training activities help organizational stakeholders to adhere to relevant occupational safety measures. This paper is reliable in expounding the significance of effective training programs in empowering employees to detect hazards, prevent accidents, and adhere to the existing national and organizational safety guidelines.

Vaismoradi, M., Tella, S., A. Logan, P., Khakurel, J., & Vizcaya-Moreno, F. (2020). Nurses’ Adherence to Patient Safety Principles: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2028. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062028

This literature review paper presents reviews of various electronic databases using appropriate keywords to access empirical scholarly works from 2010 to 2019. The researchers analyzed the findings using Vincent’s frameworks for establishing risks and safety in clinical services. They analyzed data from several scholarly articles by keying various keywords: patient, healthcare provider, work environment, and organizational management.

The purpose of this study is to establish possible organizational policies that Inspire hazard identification, prevention, and control. These policies include enhancing patients’ participation, utilizing healthcare providers’ knowledge and attitudes, fostering nurses’ collaboration, installing appropriate equipment and electronic systems to aid hazard identification and employee education.

Correspondingly, the study by Vaismoradi et al. (2020 Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Paper) highlights the importance of regular feedback systems and the standardization of the care processes in influencing nurses’ adherence to safety policies and set frameworks. Additionally, the researchers establish background information regarding factors that influence nurses’ compliance with patient-safety principles.

These factors include organizational safety cultures, time pressure, workloads, interpersonal relationships, career development activities like training, leadership commitment, and personal elements like motivation, change resistance, autonomy, empowerment, and innovative attitude. This source is appropriate in inspiring policies for hazard identification and prevention because it emphasizes the role of organizational leadership in streamlining activities like training, individual empowerment, and capitalization of individual responsibilities in facilitating safe workplaces.

Costar, D., & Hall, K. (2020). Improving Team Performance and Patient Safety on the Job Through Team Training and Performance Support Tools: A Systematic Review. Journal of Patient Safety, 16(3), S48-S56. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000746

This systematic review identified relevant articles published from 2008 to 2018 in reliable electronic databases like CINAHL and MEDLINE. The study sought to identify recent studies that emphasize practices the improve teamwork and the subsequent inputs to positive job improvements. Researchers identified 20 articles from the databases and applied quasi-experimental designs to describe different institutional approaches used in labor and delivery, operation rooms, and emergency departments.

According to Costar and Hall (2020), team training and collaboration are among the most prominent approaches to enhance healthcare process effectiveness and patient safety. For instance, team training programs target to empower employees’ knowledge, deconstruct negative attitudes, and strengthen skills and processes. Article reviews presented that there are many approaches that organizations utilize to promote healthcare quality and patient safety.

One of the most outstanding interventions is process simulation. This approach provides employee groups with realistic scenarios and avenues to face workplace routines, including how to handle emergencies (Costar & Hall, 2020). Also, it allows teams to practice and sharpen skills prerequisite for quality performance and patient safety. The study concludes that evidence-based scientific evidence supports practices of improving teamwork in healthcare organization settings. This source is reliable in presenting the role of internal policies and programs such as process simulations, group training, and job facilitation in strengthening process quality and patient safety. Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Paper

Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Paper References

Drew, J., & Pandit, M. (2020). Why healthcare leadership should embrace quality improvement. BMJ, m872. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m872

Farokhzadian, J., Dehghan Nayeri, N., & Borhani, F. (2018). The long way ahead to achieve an effective patient safety culture: challenges perceived by nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3467-1

Lawati, M., Dennis, S., Short, S., & Abdulhadi, N. (2018). Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7

World Health Organization. (2019). Patient Safety. Accessed 24th March 2021 From https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/patient-safety

Assessment 4 Safety Improvement Plan Toolkit Instructions

For this assessment, you will develop a Word document or an online resource repository of at least 12 annotated professional or scholarly resources that you consider critical for the audience of your safety improvement plan, pertaining to medication administration, to understand or implement to ensure the success of the plan.

Communication in the health care environment consists of an information-sharing experience whether through oral or written messages (Chard & Makary, 2015). As health care organizations and nurses strive to create a culture of safety and quality care, the importance of interprofessional collaboration, the development of tool kits, and the use of wikis become more relevant and vital. In addition to the dissemination of information and evidence-based findings and the development of tool kits, continuous support for and availability of such resources are critical.

Among the most popular methods to promote ongoing dialogue and information sharing are blogs, wikis, websites, and social media. Nurses know how to support people in time of need or crisis and how to support one another in the workplace; wikis in particular enable nurses to continue that support beyond the work environment. Here they can be free to share their unique perspectives, educate others, and promote health care wellness at local and global levels (Kaminski, 2016).

You are encouraged to complete the Determining the Relevance and Usefulness of Resources activity prior to developing the repository. This activity will help you determine which resources or research will be most relevant to address a particular need. This may be useful as you consider how to explain the purpose and relevance of the resources you are assembling for your tool kit. The activity is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates course engagement.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
Analyze usefulness of resources for role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements with medication administration.
Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk or improve quality with medication administration.
Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and sustainability of a safety improvement initiative focusing on medication administration.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
Present compelling reasons and relevant situations for resource tool kit to be used by its target audience.
Communicate resource tool kit in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that applies current APA style and formatting.

References

Chard, R., & Makary, M. A. (2015). Transfer-of-care communication: Nursing best practices. AORN Journal, 102(4), 329-342.

Kaminski, J. (2016). Why all nurses can/should be authors. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 11(4), 1-7.

Professional Context

Nurses are often asked to implement processes, concepts, or practices sometimes with little preparatory communication or education. One way to encourage sustainability of quality and process improvements is to assemble an accessible, user-friendly tool kit for knowledge and process documentation. Creating a resource repository or tool kit is also an excellent way to follow up an educational or in-service session, as it can help to reinforce attendees\’ new knowledge as well as the understanding of its value. By practicing creating a simple online tool kit, you can develop valuable technology skills to improve your competence and efficacy. This technology is easy to use, and resources are available to guide you.

Scenario

For this assessment, consider taking one of these two approaches:

Build on the work done in your first three assessments and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help the audience of your in-service understand the research behind your safety improvement plan pertaining to medication administration and put the plan into action.
Locate a safety improvement plan (your current organization, the Institution for Healthcare Improvement, or a publicly available safety improvement initiative) pertaining to medication administration and create an online tool kit or resource repository that will help an audience understand the research behind the safety improvement plan and how to put the plan into action.

Preparation

Google Sites is recommended for this assessment; the tools are free to use and should offer you a blend of flexibility and simplicity as you create your online tool kit. Please note that this requires a Google account; use your Gmail or GoogleDocs login, or create an account following the directions under the \”Create Account\” menu.

Refer to the following links to help you get started with Google Sites:

G Suite Learning Center. (n.d.). Get started with Sites. https://gsuite.google.com/learning-center/products/sites/get-started/#!/
Google. (n.d.). Sites. https://sites.google.com
Google. (n.d.). Sites help. https://support.google.com/sites/?hl=en#topic=

Instructions

Using Google Sites, assemble an online resource tool kit containing at least 12 annotated resources that you consider critical to the success of your safety improvement initiative. These resources should enable nurses and others to implement and maintain the safety improvement you have developed.

It is recommended that you focus on the 3 or 4 most critical categories or themes with respect to your safety improvement initiative pertaining to medication administration. For example, for an initiative that concerns improving workplace safety for practitioners, you might choose broad themes such as general organizational safety and quality best practices; environmental safety and quality risks; individual strategies to improve personal and team safety; and process best practices for reporting and improving environmental safety issues.

Following the recommended scheme, you would collect 3 resources on average for each of the 4 categories focusing on safety with medication administration. Each resource listing should include the following:

An APA-formatted citation of the resource with a working link.
A description of the information, skills, or tools provided by the resource.
A brief explanation of how the resource can help nurses better understand or implement the safety improvement initiative pertaining to medication administration.
A description of how nurses can use this resource and when its use may be appropriate.
Remember that you must make your site \”public\” so that your faculty can access it. Check out the Google Sites resources for more information.

Here is an example entry:

Merret, A., Thomas, P., Stephens, A., Moghabghab, R., & Gruneir, M. (2011). A collaborative approach to fall prevention. Canadian Nurse, 107(8), 24â€“29. www.canadian-nurse.com/articles/issues/2011/october-2011/a-collaborative-ap

This article presents the Geriatric Emergency Management-Falls Intervention Team (GEM-FIT) project. It shows how a collaborative nurse lead project can be implemented and used to improve collaboration and interdisciplinary teamwork, as well as improve the delivery of health care services. This resource is likely more useful to nurses as a resource for strategies and models for assembling and participating in an interdisciplinary team than for specific fall-prevention strategies. It is suggested that this resource be reviewed prior to creating an interdisciplinary team for a collaborative project in a health care setting.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

Identify necessary resources to support the implementation and continued sustainability of a safety improvement initiative pertaining to medication administration.

Analyze the usefulness of resources to the role group responsible for implementing quality and safety improvements focusing on medication administration.

Analyze the value of resources to reduce patient safety risk related to medication administration.
Present compelling reasons and relevant situations for use of resource tool kit by its target audience.

Communicate in a clear, logically structured, and professional manner that applies current APA style and formatting.

Example Assessment: You may use the following example to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with medication administration. Note that you do not have to submit your bibliography in addition to the Google Site; the example bibliography is merely for your reference.

Assessment 4 Example [PDF].

To submit your online tool kit assessment, paste the link to your Google Site in the assessment submission box.

Example Google Site: You may use the example Google Site, Resources for Safety and Improvement Measures in Geropsychiatric Care, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like for this assessment but keep in mind that your tool kit will focus on promoting safety with medication administration.

Note: If you experience technical or other challenges in completing this assessment, please contact your faculty member.

Additional Requirements

APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style