NURS-FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template
Part 1: Course Evaluation Template Sample
C# | Criteria | Non-Performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
C1 | Concept of social determinants of health (SDOH), and their role in health | Does:· Describes the concept of SDOH but not extensivelyDoes Not: · Provide examples of SDOH and elaborate on them · Explain how SDOH affects thinking and healthcare institution’s utilization · Explain a clear link between these SDOH | Does:· Describes the concept of SDOH· Provides examples of SDOH and elaborates them Does Not: · Explain how SDOH affects thinking and healthcare institution’s utilization · Explain a clear link between these SDOH | Does:· Describes the concept of SDOH· Provides examples of SDOH and elaborates them · Explains how SDOH affects thinking and healthcare institution’s utilization Does Not: · Explain a clear link between these SDOH | Does:· Describes the concept of SDOH extensively· Provides examples of SDOH and elaborates them · Explains how SDOH affects thinking and healthcare institution’s utilization · Explains a clear link between these SDOHs. |
C2 | The various components of culture and how they affect health | Does Not:· Describe the various cultural components· Describe how they affect culture | Does:· Describes two or fewer components of the cultureDoes Not: · Explain how they vary among cultures · Explain a clear link between these components and health | Does:· Describes three to four components of culture· Explain the variation in cultures among different ethnicities Does Not: · Provide a clear link between the cultures and health | Does:· Describes four or more components of culture· Explains how they vary among cultures · Explains a clear link between these components and health |
C3 | Local, state, and federal laws addressing cultural competence in healthcare | Does Not: · Identify or explain the local, state, and federal laws that address cultural competence in healthcare · Identify gaps in knowledge, areas of uncertainty, and areas that require improvement | Does: · Identifies the local, state, and federal laws that address cultural competence in healthcare Does Not: · Explain adequately the identified laws and how they impact cultural competence in healthcare · Identify gaps in knowledge, areas of uncertainty, and areas that require improvement | Does: · Identifies and explains the local, state, and federal laws that address cultural competence in healthcare Does Not: · Identify gaps in knowledge, areas of uncertainty, and areas that require improvement | Does: · Identifies and explains the local, state, and federal laws that address cultural competence in healthcare · Identifies gaps in knowledge, areas of uncertainty, and areas that require improvement |
C4 | Consequences of the lack of cultural sensitivity to patient safety, care quality, and interprofessional collaboration. | Does Not: · Explain the consequences of the lack of cultural sensitivity to care quality, patient safety, and interprofessional collaboration · Explain the need for cultural sensitivity · Provide examples of cultural sensitivity issues and their healthcare implication | Does: · Explains the consequences of the lack of cultural sensitivity to care quality, patient safety, and interprofessional collaboration Does Not: · Explain the need for cultural sensitivity · Provide examples of cultural sensitivity issues and their healthcare implication | Does: · Explains the consequences of the lack of cultural sensitivity to care quality, patient safety, and interprofessional collaboration · Explains the need for cultural sensitivity Does Not: · Provide examples of cultural sensitivity issues and their healthcare implication | Does: · Explains the consequences of the lack of cultural sensitivity to care quality, patient safety, and interprofessional collaboration · Explains the need for cultural sensitivity · Provides examples of cultural sensitivity issues and their healthcare implication |
C5 | Write clearly and logically, using correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics | Does Not: · Write clearly and logically, with the correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics | Does: · Writes with errors in clarity, logic, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or mechanics. | Does: · Writes clearly and logically, using spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics Does Not: · Provide adequate, relevant evidence to support a central idea. | Does: · Writes clearly and logically, using spelling, grammar, punctuation, mechanics · Provides relevant evidence to support a central idea. |
Part 2: Executive Summary
Learning and teaching are two distinct words that are frequently and incorrectly used interchangeably. While teaching refers to an educator delivering, administering, or giving lessons on a specific subject or topic, learning refers to the acquisition of knowledge through study, being taught, or experience (Welch, 2021). As a result, it is very possible that teaching can occur without actual learning taking place. Continuous assessment and evaluation are essential for determining whether course objectives have been met.
A course evaluation’s primary function is to (1) assess whether the course served its intended purpose and (2) evaluate the learning outcomes and instructional content (Kern, 2019). The assessment is also key in determining the course’s potential to trigger students’ cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains.
How Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Domains have been addressed in the Course Evaluation.
Human learners have three yet interdependent components of learning outcomes, which include the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains. The cognitive domain includes knowledge acquisition as well as mental and intellectual processes, whereas the psychomotor domain refers to learning behaviors achieved through neuromuscular motor activities (Mallillin, 2022). The affective domain, on the other hand, reflects the learners’ emotional arena.
A seemingly important question is how the evaluation tool addressed all of the learning domains. Concerning the first learning objective, describing the SDOH and elaborating on how they affect health is intended to solidify the cognitive domain, as it requires critical thinking and reflection on the surrounding social factors and how they affect health. This domain enables a person to acquire knowledge, comprehend concepts, apply, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate information obtained from various sources.
The psychomotor domain, which involves the use of neuromotor and motor activities, is reflected in the evaluation tool by a learner’s ability to search for literature online, filter the articles, and decide which source to use (Mallillin, 2022). This domain also improves a student’s research skills by requiring the examination of reliable databases for peer-reviewed sources.
The other domain, affective, requires learners to be in their natural affective nature to address some of the concepts of the assignment. For example, in the second learning objective, cultural components and how they affect health, the learner must express their emotions most appropriately as they reflect on their cultures, and correlate it with health. It is thus appropriate to state that the above evaluation tool meets the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of learning.
Evaluation Format that adequately assesses Learning and Program Outcomes
Several tools can be used to assess learners’ comprehension. In this case, an assignment serves as the best evaluation tool to assess the learners’ SDOH outcomes and the impact cultural sensitivity has on health. The assignment will be available to all students, with the only requirement being that they have attended at least 80% of all course sessions. The marks assigned, out of 100, will reflect the student’s amount of knowledge acquired during the course sessions and will determine whether or not learning occurred.
An assignment is an effective way for educators to determine students’ learning strengths and weaknesses, necessitating the implementation of strategies to maximize learning (Huang et al., 2021). Some of the assignment questions will be as follows: describe the concept of SDOH and its impact on health; describe the various components of culture and how they affect health, and describe the various components of culture and how they affect health.
Other questions include: identifying and explaining the local, state, and federal laws governing cultural competence in healthcare, and finally, what are the consequences of cultural sensitivity on patient safety and quality of care. Since students have different learning strengths, educators do not expect everyone to score above the average, which is usually 50%. The scores are expected to be distributed so that students fall into one of four categories: distinctions, credit, pass, or fail.
According to Akçakoca and Orgun (2021), assignments provide an opportunity for students to learn, practice, and demonstrate what they have accomplished in the learning goals. If a learning objective is not met, the educator may conduct a reflective survey to ask students what went wrong and what could be done differently in the future.
Validity and Reliability of Evaluation Methods
It is critical to assess the validity and reliability of an assignment before delivering it to students. Typically, faculty members assist in determining the validity of an evaluation tool before it is administered to students (Mackintosh-Franklin, 2021). In this case, the nursing faculty, which includes various experts in the field, will be tasked with moderating the assignment or test.
The goal of moderation, in this case, is to ensure that the questions asked have been addressed within the scope of the course and that nothing new outside the scope of the course is introduced (Mackintosh-Franklin, 2021). Furthermore, the goal of validation, or, in this case, moderation, is to ensure that students are capable of answering the questions regardless of their learning strengths. Following validation, some questions become extremely simple to answer and can be correctly answered by any student.
In contrast, others become extremely difficult to answer and can only be correctly answered by the top students. In terms of reliability, using different examiners to mark the same scripts will be the most effective approach. This strategy generates various scores, and statistical analysis of the scores aids in determining the assessment’s reliability. While the inter-rater reliability score would have been the best strategy for assessing the reliability of the assessment tool, it is extremely difficult for students to cooperate and take the same test twice, thereby eliminating it as a potential assessment tool in this case.
NURS-FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template References
- Akçakoca, B., & Orgun, F. (2021). Developing a measurement tool for evaluating the hidden curriculum in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 97(104688), 104688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104688
- Huang, A., Hancock, D., Clemson, M., Yeo, G., Harney, D., Denny, P., & Denyer, G. (2021). Selecting student-authored questions for summative assessments. Research in Learning Technology, 29. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v29.2517
- Kern, J. (2019). Course Evaluation Summary: An enlightening and useful documentation tool for assessing learner outcomes and developing plans for nursing course improvement. Nursing Education Perspectives, 40(6), 370–371. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000366
- Mackintosh-Franklin, D. C. (2021). An evaluation of formative feedback and its impact on undergraduate student nurse academic achievement. Nurse Education in Practice, 50(102930), 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102930
- Mallillin, L. L. D. (2022). Different Domains in Learning and the Academic Performance of the Students Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leovigildo-Lito-Mallillin/publication/339844626_Different_Domains_in_Learning_and_the_Academic_Performance_of_the_Students/links/5e68d496299bf1744f72ef31/Different-Domains-in-Learning-and-the-Academic-Performance-of-the-Students.pdf
- Welch, S. (2021). Program evaluation: A concept analysis. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.08.001
Course Evaluation Template Scoring Guide
CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
Create a standardized course evaluation template that can be used to evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes in a program offering. | Does not create a standardized course evaluation template that can be used to evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes in a program offering. | Creates a standardized course evaluation template that can be used to evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes in a program offering, but the template is unclear or incomplete. | Creates a standardized course evaluation template that can be used to evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes in a program offering. | Creates a standardized course evaluation template that can be used to evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes in a program offering, and presents relevant evidence to support assessment strategies used to create the template. |
Ensure that the appropriate cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains have been addressed in a course evaluation. | Does not ensure that the appropriate cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains have been assessed in a course evaluation. | Includes some cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains in a course evaluation, but the assessments may be inappropriate, unclear, or incomplete. | Ensures that the appropriate cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains have been assessed in a course evaluation. | Ensures that the appropriate cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains have been assessed in a course evaluation, and identifies assumptions on which the assessments are based. |
Select an evaluation format that adequately assesses learning and program outcomes. | Does not select an evaluation format that adequately assesses learning and program outcomes. | Selects an evaluation format that partially assesses learning and program outcomes. | Selects an evaluation format that adequately assesses learning and program outcomes. | Selects an evaluation format that adequately assesses learning and program outcomes, and identifies criteria that could be used to evaluate the format selected. |
Support the validity and reliability of evaluation methods used in a course evaluation form. | Does not support the validity and reliability of evaluation methods used in a course evaluation form. | Attempts to support the validity and reliability of evaluation methods used in a course evaluation form, but the support is either unclear or inappropriate. | Supports the validity and reliability of evaluation methods used in a course evaluation form. | Supports the validity and reliability of evaluation methods used in a course evaluation form, and impartially assesses the strengths and weaknesses of the evaluation methods. |
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. | Does not write clearly, logically, or with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. | Writes with errors in clarity, logic, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or mechanics. | Writes clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. | Writes clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics; and uses relevant evidence to support a central idea. |
Correctly format the assessment, citations, and references using APA style. | Does not format the assessment, citations, and references using APA style. | Formats the assessment, citations, and references using APA style, but with errors and inconsistencies. | Correctly formats the assessment, citations, and references using APA style. Citations and references contain a few errors. | Correctly formats the assessment, citations, and references using APA style. Citations and references are free from all errors. |
Resources: Capella University Library Resources
-
- Ekman, N., Taft, C., Moons, P., Mäkitalo, A., Boström, E., & Fors, A. (2020). A state-of-the-art review of direct observation tools for assessing competency in person-centred care. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103634
- Unsworth, J., Melling, A., & Porteous, D. (2021). Development and evaluation of the validity and reliability of the leading and managing care pre-registration nursing student assessment tool. SAGE Open Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608211000259
- Akçakoca, B., & Orgun, F. (2021). Developing a measurement tool for evaluating the hidden curriculum in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104688
- Kern, J. (2019). Course evaluation summary: An enlightening and useful documentation tool for assessing learner outcomes and developing plans for nursing course improvement. Nursing Education Perspectives, 40(6), 370–371.
- National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (n.d.). Test plans. https://www.ncsbn.org/testplans.htm
- Welch, S. (2021). Program evaluation: A concept analysis. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(1), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.08.001.
- Huang, A., Hancock, D., Clemson, M., Yeo, G., Harney, D., Denny, P., & Denyer, G. (2021). Selecting student-authored questions for summative assessments. Research in Learning Technology, 29. http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.25304/rlt.v29.2517
- Mackintosh-Franklin, C. (2021). An evaluation of formative feedback and its impact on undergraduate student nurse academic achievement. Nurse Education in Practice, 50. http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102930
NURS-FPX6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template Instructions
ASSESSMENT_3_Course_Evaluation_Template_Scoring_Guide
ASSESSMENT_3_Instructions_(Important) (1)
Also Read: NURS-FPX6008 Assessment 1 Proposing a New Initiative