HLT 362 Week 4 Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Quality Improvement

Answers

  1. How much a surgical site infection (SSI) costs varies according to the degree of the infection as well as the site of surgery. However, it should cost at least $25,000. If it involves a prosthetic implant, the cost can rise to more than $90,000. As a whole, the United States healthcare incurs between $3.5 to $10 billion yearly on SSIs (Iskandar et al., 2019 Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion).

Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

  1. SSIs impact the patient negatively, both mentally and physically. The patient will experience a period where they will be unable to report to their workplaces, leading to loss of earnings during that time. It can also lead to patient mortality. There are high chances that the patient will experience pain and anxiety. The patient’s family will also be affected. They might have to spare time to look after the individual during the recovery time. The condition will also take an emotional toll on them.
  2. Steps to be used in quality improvement
  • List down the improvement opportunities according to their priority.
  • Outline the improvement objectives.
  • Collect and organize the necessary data.
  • Pick the root cause
  • Come up with potential solutions
  • Pick the best solution
  • Implement the identified solution and then evaluate the outcome.
  1. Tools utilized for quality improvement are standalone strategies that assist an individual comprehend, analyze, or communicate the efforts involved. Quality Improvement Proposal DiscussionQuality Improvement Proposal Discussion

A Pareto Chart is an effective quality improvement tool in this scenario. It highlights the most important factor among a set. During quality control, it displays the most common defects sources, the type of defect that occurs the highest, or the most mentioned reasons attributed to customers’ complaints.

  1. To get the best post coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) guidelines, Carmen can look into the pieces of advice provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). There are a few precise official recommendations involving wound practices for CABG surgeries. Most suggest a change of bandages at least once a day or as frequently as possible. CDC advises that the wound be protected for 24 to 48 hours using a sterile dressing and that the hands of the person doing the dressing should always be clean (Purba et al., 2020 Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion).
  2. To share the learned information regarding her experience, Carmen can write a journal that can be accessed by healthcare personnel, illustrating her discoveries. She can also post the information online on various platforms, including social media.

Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion References

  • Iskandar, K., Sartelli, M., Tabbal, M., Ansaloni, L., Baiocchi, G. L., Catena, F., Coccolini, F., Haque, M., Labricciosa, F. M., Moghabghab, A., Pagani, L., Hanna, P. A., Roques, C., Salameh, P., Molinier, L. (2019). Highlighting the gaps in quantifying the economic burden of surgical site infections associated with antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 14(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0266-x
  • Purba, A. K. R., Luz, C. F., Wulandari, R. R., van der Gun, I., Dik, J. W., Friedrich, A. W., & Postma, M. J. (2020). The Impacts of Deep Surgical Site Infections on Readmissions, Length of Stay, and Costs: A Matched Case–Control Study Conducted in an Academic Hospital in the Netherlands. Infection and Drug Resistance, 13, 3365. https://dx.doi.org/10.2147%2FIDR.S264068

HLT 362 Week 4 Quality Improvement Proposal Instructions

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply “The Road to Evidence-Based Practice” process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Include the following:

  1. Provide an overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.
  2. Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.
  3. Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the Class Resources or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion
  4. Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.
  5. Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.
  6. Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion Rubric Criteria

Problem or Issue in Practice or Organization

Problem or Issue in Practice or Organization

Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is described in detail.

Significance of Quality Improvement in Practice or Organization

Criteria Description

Significance of Quality Improvement in Practice or Organization

Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is need is clearly discussed. The quality improvement initiative would help address the problem within the described setting presented. The expected outcome is thoroughly described. Overall, the explanation is clear and well supported. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Demonstration of Support From Previous Research

Criteria Description

Demonstration of Support From Previous Research

The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is clearly presented. The research results strongly demonstrate support for the initiative and projected outcomes. The three peer-reviewed sources meet all assignment criteria and provide critical support for the initiative. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is presented. The research results demonstrate support for the initiative and projected outcomes. The three peer-reviewed sources meet all assignment criteria.

Steps Necessary to Implement Quality Improvement Initiative

Criteria Description

Steps Necessary to Implement Quality Improvement Initiative

The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are thoroughly discussed. The implantation steps are well supported with evidence and rationale. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Evaluation of Quality Improvement

Criteria Description

Evaluation of Quality Improvement

An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is presented in detail. The evaluation is appropriate to the quality improvement initiative. Evaluation proposed is well supported.

An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is presented. The evaluation is appropriate to the quality improvement initiative.

Identification of Variables, Hypothesis Test, and Statistical Test

Criteria Description

Identification of Variables, Hypothesis Test, and Statistical Test

The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are presented and accurate. The proposed elements will prove whether the quality improvement succeeded.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing 

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format 

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

REFERENCES MUST BE BETWEEN 2018-2022

Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion RESSOURCES

Is This Quality Improvement or Research?

Read “Is This Quality Improvement or Research?” by Merrill, from American Nurse Today (2015).

https://www.americannursetoday.com/quality-improvement-research/

Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research

Read “Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research,

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129106232&site=eds-live&scope=site

Applied Statistics for Health Care

Read Chapter 4 in Applied Statistics for Health Care. Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/applied-statistics-for-health-care_1e.php

Chapter 44: Tools and Strategies for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety

Read “Chapter 44: Tools and Strategies for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety,” by Hughes, from the online eBook, Pa

… Read More

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2682/

Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement

Read “Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement,” by Gregory, from Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nurs

… Read More Quality Improvement Proposal Discussion

https://www.nursingcenter.com/pdfjournal?AID=3099809&an=00005237-201504000-00005&Journal_ID=54008&Issue_ID=3099787

Chapter 14: Regression

Review “Chapter 14: Regression,” and watch the associated videos by Lane, from Online Statistics Education: An Interactive Mu

… Read More

http://onlinestatbook.com/2/regression/regression.html

The Visual Learner: Statistics

Refer to the “Visual Learner: Statistics” to learn more about the statistical calculations presented in this topic.

http://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt362v/the-visual-learner/the-visual-learner-v2.1.html